High Performance Landscapes

Research Team

Keri McNew Barfield

Director of Finance

Click here to download the High Performance Landscape Calculator Tool (beta, April 2018). 

BRIT has entered into a cooperative agreement with the General Services Administration (GSA) on a research project addressing the links between urban landscaping decisions and their effects on the ecosystem services provided by landscapes. The purpose of the research is to inform landscaping design and maintenance decisions on Federal lands in hopes of creating a positive impact on the environment as a whole. To gauge the effects of landscaping decisions on ecosystem services, we are focusing on water use, pollinator habitat, and net carbon footprint. The project is being principally investigated by Heather Bass (BRIT’s Botanical Research Assistant), Amy Belaire (BRIT Research Associate, Urban Ecologist), and Heather Venhaus (BRIT Research Associate, Environmental Designer and site sustainability consultant).



Lawn irrigation consumes 30% of municipal freshwater in the eastern U.S. and up to 60% in the west. Lawns are now the most irrigated crop in the U.S., covering three times as much area as any other irrigated crop - an area roughly the size of Texas. To reduce freshwater use, we need to start transitioning the way we landscape to be much more sustainable, and use more native plants.

An extremely important aspect of a sustainable landscape is ecosystem services - the goods and services provided by ecosystems that sustain and fulfill human life. Ecosystem services provided by a sustainable, high efficiency landscapes include climate regulation, carbon sequestration, air and water cleansing, storm water mitigation, freshwater storage, urban habitat for animals, and a relaxing green space for people. Historically, we have depended upon natural areas outside of our cities to provide these services.  However, due to population growth, increased development, and the human migration from rural to urban areas, it is becoming increasingly important that our urban landscapes accomplish more. Similar to high performance buildings that are acknowledged through programs such as LEED, we can also develop high performance landscapes that reduce resource use and increase the provision of ecosystem services.

One goal is to have the benefits of our landscape out-weigh the costs. For example, manicured lawns can act as carbon sinks and help mitigate climate change, but the carbon sequestration potential is greatly reduced by the carbon emissions of typical maintenance practices. For this project, benefits and costs will be determined through an in-depth literature review and on-the-ground research at BRIT and the Fort Worth Federal Center which is at the intersection of Felix Street and Hemphill.  Research findings will result in a series of landscape recommendations and the development of a high performance landscape evaluation tool.

Goals of the Project


At this point, very little is known about how site-scale design and management choices affect ecosystem services. The GSA/BRIT research project will address this gap in knowledge by determining the ecological outcomes associated with various landscape design & management choices. 

Our research plots will help us better understand the effects of these decisions. In particular, our goal is to determine the relationships between landscape “inputs” and the resulting ecosystem service “outputs.” We are focusing on three ecological variables that are especially
relevant in urban sites:

  1. Water volume required for irrigation

    a.  Design choices: inclusion of native plants that thrive in dry soils, increased organic matter in the soil with compost amendments, and reduced compaction during installation and maintenance.
  2. Benefits to native pollinators

    a.  Design choices: inclusion of high-value nectar plants that are native to the ecoregion, expanded total time during which plants in the landscape are in bloom, and increased number of native plant species.
  3. Net carbon footprint

    a.  Design choices: the “embodied carbon” associated with different materials used on the landscape for maintenance, the greenhouse gas emissions associated with different maintenance equipment, and designed landscapes’ ability to store and sequester carbon in soils and plant biomass.

In addition to these ecological variables, we are also considering the aesthetic appeal of the plot designs and soil health.

Methods of the Project

Our on-the-ground research consists of 40 research plots: 20 at each of two sites in Fort Worth, Texas.

GSA Site
The first site is the Fort Worth Federal Center on Felix Street - a large GSA site with many federal tenants. At this site, the research focus is the relationship between landscaping decisions and pollinator abundance. These plots vary by the percent cover of high value pollinator plants, total bloom time, and design aesthetic. They are planted with all low water use plants native to Texas and commonly available in the landscaping trade.


The second research site is at the Botanical Research Institute of Texas (BRIT), connected to the Fort Worth Botanic Gardens in the heart of Fort Worth’s cultural district. At BRIT, the 20 plots are in the parking lot situated at the end of bioswales. At this site, the research focus is the relationships between landscaping decisions and water use. These plots vary by the percent organic matter in the soil, water use level of plants, and design aesthetic. They are all planted with plants native to Texas and commonly available in the landscaping trade, except for two commonly used non-native turf grasses, which were chosen in order to compare their water use to that of native turf and non-turf plants.

For the next two years, we are collecting data in the plots at both sites on: water use to maintain aesthetic appearance of the landscape, pollinator abundance, diversity, and visitation rates, time spent on maintenance (including use of gas-powered equipment), plant characteristics, and soil health.

Pollinator observations are done at both sites every other month between March and September. After an establishment period for the plants, water use of each plot is monitored and manipulated for two years through water limitations and plant stress observations. Maintenance and soil compaction data will also be collected.

Impact of the Project

The ultimate goal of this project is to develop a preliminary version of a landscape assessment tool that helps users evaluate the environmental implications of their design and management choices. This tool would allow users to input details about their anticipated choices in the landscape and get a summary of expected outcomes. For example, a user could see the estimated volume of water savings that would come from different surface area coverage of lawn versus native plant species or the number of pollinators that might visit the landscape depending on plant choices. The user could also see the estimated change in carbon footprint associated with their expected maintenance practices, anticipated watering schedule, or choices in soil amendments.

The data we’re collecting will help inform the equations and values underlying the calculator. In the end, we hope this tool will be useful to landscape architects, designers, maintenance/operations directors, even home-owners…. Anyone with a designed landscape who wants to improve performance.

gsa pollinators